Kevin Hart’s Role in ICO Scam May Go Unpunished

Published at: April 25, 2020

Investors who participated in the FLiK initial coin offering, or ICO, in 2017 have opposed entertainer Kevin Hart’s bid to have the $7 million lawsuit dismissed.

The 25 investors claim that they collectively lost more than $2 million as a result of Hart, rapper ‘T.I.’, and FLiK executive, Ryan Felton, touting unregistered securities for an ICO that ultimately failed to materialize.

ICO investors fight for suit against Kevin Hart to proceed

In their opposition, the plaintiffs argued that the FLiK ICO “depended on” endorsements from celebrities to “elevate the standing” and perception of the offering.

The investors assert that they have “sufficiently pled that Mr. Hart was generally aware of his role in the scheme or at the very least was reckless in promoting an unregistered sham to his 50,000,000 followers.”

Plaintiffs argue that Hart’s endorsement “increased the price of the thinly traded security” — driving the token’s price up by 400% from $0.06 to $0.30 between August and October of 2017, in anticipation of the company’s ICO. 

However, prices would crumble 73% over the following year as the tokensale failed to materialize — falling back to $0.08 by September 2018. 

Hart accused of materially aiding FLiK

In October 2018, the 25 investors filed a $5 million suit against T.I. and Ryan Felton, claiming that they had been defrauded into purchasing now-worthless unregistered securities as a result of misrepresentations and celebrity endorsements. 

The plaintiffs amended their class-action to include $7 million in claims against Kevin Hart during May 2019, with the investors accusing the entertainer of having materially aided the fraudulent tokensale.

In September 2017, Hart posted a photo of himself with T.I. on Facebook alongside a caption that read:

“Me telling [T.I.] how much help he gon need spending all that money he gonna make on his new venture. Lmfao But seriously, I'm Super Excited for T.I. and FLiK They're gonna crush it! #ICO #blockchain #crypto #bitcoin.”

Charges against T.I. dismissed

On March 3, 2020, T.I. was dismissed of all securities fraud charges relating to the ICO, with U.S. District Judge Charles Pannell ruling that the plaintiffs had failed to find concrete evidence of securities violations.

“The plaintiffs have merely alleged that [T.I.] encouraged his Twitter followers to visit the website for the FLiK ICO,” said Judge Pannell. “They have not provided any statements from Harris about the value of the FLiK tokens.”

In his request for early judgment earlier this month, Hart argued that the fraud allegations laid against him were “threadbare” and exhibit less merit than the now-dismissed claims against T.I.

Tags
Ico
Related Posts
Abramoff-linked crypto firm says SEC has no case against it
The NAC Foundation has accused the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of misconduct in an ongoing case. According to court documents Oct. 20, Rowland Marcus Andrade and his company NAC Foundation asked a San Francisco federal judge to dismiss the SEC’s June lawsuit alleging that he and his associate Jack Abramoff defrauded investors in a $5.6 million token offering. Andrade argued that the SEC “purposefully attempted to mislead the court” by accusing him of offering a technology that had never been developed. According to the defendant, the SEC was aware that he held patents for Anti-Money Laundering technology related …
Regulation / Oct. 21, 2020
SEC charges promoters of Steven Seagal-spruiked ICO from 2018
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has charged three individuals for various cryptocurrency frauds including the 2018 initial coin offering for the Steven Seagal-promoted altcoin, Bitcoiin2Gen. A Feb. 1 SEC announcement estimates that Bitcoiin Gen founder John DeMarr, Start Options founder Kristijan Krstic, and promotor Robin Enos duped investors out of more than $11 million through two fraudulent and unregistered securities offerings from December 2017 until May 2018. The SEC alleges that Krstic and DeMarr first spruiked Start Options’ purported crypto asset mining and trading platform in December 2017 and January 2017, falsely claiming it was “the largest Bitcoin exchange …
Regulation / Feb. 2, 2021
Florida Man Charged Over $1.6M ‘Compcoin’ Scam
The United States Commodity Futures Trade Commission (CFTC) has filed a complaint against Florida resident Alan Friedland for fraudulently raising $1.6 million through a cryptocurrency tied to a forex trading scheme. The April 16 filing accuses Friedland and his companies Fintech Investment Group, Inc and Compcoin LLC of illegally soliciting investments and publishing “untrue and materially misleading” press materials for its digital asset Compcoin from 2016 until 2018. ‘Proprietary trading algorithm’ The defendant claimed that Compcoin would allow customers to access Fintech’s proprietary trading algorithm ART and would deliver high returns on investment. Friedland falsely claimed that ART’s profit potential …
Regulation / April 17, 2020
US SEC Freezes Assets of Alleged Crypto Scam Backed by a Former State Senator
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has frozen the assets of Meta 1 Coin, an alleged crypto scam backed by a former state senator that promised investors returns of up to 224,923% without ever having any actual tokens. Per a March 20 announcement from the SEC, the regulator initially froze Meta 1’s assets on March 16 and is charging the firm’s operators with fraud. Currently, the SEC seems to be pursuing fines and disgorgement rather than jailtime for those involved. Claims of art and gold assets Meta 1 claimed its tokens were backed, but the cited backing shifted …
Regulation / March 20, 2020
Court Orders Purported Crypto Company Longfin to Pay $6.7M Penalty
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has ordered purported cryptocurrency company Longfin to pay a total of $6,755,848 million in penalties. Falsely obtained qualification for Regulation A+ offering On Sept. 30, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that a New York federal court entered a default ruling against the fintech company for “fraudulent public offering and falsifying revenue from sham commodities transactions.” According to the SEC, Longfin and its CEO Venkata S. Meenavalli falsely obtained qualification for a Regulation A+ offering by claiming that the blockchain-powered firm was operating within the U.S. However, …
Blockchain / Oct. 1, 2019