Certain regulatory clarity could be 'hugely detrimental' for crypto, says former CFPB director

Published at: Aug. 23, 2022

Kathy Kraninger, former director of the United States Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, said while many in crypto have complained about the lack of regulatory clarity in the country, the legal gray area has afforded the industry opportunities.

Speaking to Cointelegraph, Kraninger said Congressional action on dividing the roles of different regulatory agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or CFTC — would be the “best outcome” in her view. However, she added it was unlikely any single department would have total control over the variety of investment products related to the digital asset space.

“It’s not going to be in the SEC’s interest or its nature — or certainly its chairman’s current posture — to come out and say ‘oh yeah, let me give you all the criteria for what a security is that is going to answer everybody’s questions’,” said the former CFPB director. “That’s just not going to happen and I can see why in some respects why the industry says it wants that, but if it got that, it also could be hugely detrimental. It could be a big overreach, it could extend beyond.”

The SEC, CFTC, CFPB, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, and Federal Trade Commission handle different aspects of digital asset regulation and enforcement in the United States, resulting in a patchwork approach companies must navigate to legally operate. Some U.S. lawmakers have proposed certain agencies collaborate to establish regulatory clarity, while others have introduced legislation aimed at giving one department more authority than others.

Another option for regulatory clarity, according to Kraninger, could lie in case law from enforcement actions. In July, the SEC labeled 9 cryptocurrencies as securities in an insider trading case against former Coinbase product manager Ishan Wahi, his brother, and an associate. Lawyers representing a former OpenSea product head accused of insider trading claimed in a Friday filing that authorities were using the case in an attempt to set a legal precedent that nonfungible tokens were securities.

Kraninger added that applications in the decentralized finance space could be the next big proving ground among regulators:

“DeFi just takes it to a whole different echelon in terms of the agencies that could be implicated, the use cases, the lack of intermediaries, if you truly are centralized [...] Just that whole decentralized ecosystem and the use cases therein — that’s something that regulators across the globe are really going to struggle with.”

Related: US Senator Hagerty to CFPB Director: Don’t stifle crypto innovation

Kraninger has worked as the vice president of regulatory affairs at market surveillance firm Solidus Labs since July 2021 following her departure from the CFPB. On Aug. 16, former CFTC commissioner Dawn Stump announced that she would also be joining the company as a strategic advisor.

Tags
Sec
Law
Related Posts
Crypto, Congress and the Commission: What’s next for the ‘Wild West’?
The entire cryptocurrency industry is waking up to a new reality. Politicians and regulators have decided to wade into the space, which had flown mainly under their radar until now. A House committee chair is launching a working group; the Securities and Exchange Commission is seeking new authorities to regulate digital assets as securities; and the Senate-passed infrastructure bill includes $28 billion in tax revenues from crypto transactions. This last handful of weeks has arguably seen more regulatory activity around digital currencies since the name Satoshi Nakamoto first entered the popular lexicon. Anyone whose business deals in this asset class …
Bitcoin / Aug. 28, 2021
Abramoff-linked crypto firm says SEC has no case against it
The NAC Foundation has accused the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of misconduct in an ongoing case. According to court documents Oct. 20, Rowland Marcus Andrade and his company NAC Foundation asked a San Francisco federal judge to dismiss the SEC’s June lawsuit alleging that he and his associate Jack Abramoff defrauded investors in a $5.6 million token offering. Andrade argued that the SEC “purposefully attempted to mislead the court” by accusing him of offering a technology that had never been developed. According to the defendant, the SEC was aware that he held patents for Anti-Money Laundering technology related …
Regulation / Oct. 21, 2020
SEC vs. Telegram: Part 2 — The case against integrating the two prongs of a SAFT
As discussed in the previous article, Telegram is a popular global instant messaging company. In 2018, it sold contractual rights to acquire a new crypto asset that it was developing (to be called Grams) to a group of accredited (and wealthy) investors around the world. Telegram raised about $1.7 billion from 171 investors, including 39 U.S. purchasers. This was a prelude to the planned launch of Grams, which was to occur about a year and a half later in October 2019. This two-step process — where a crypto entrepreneur sells contractual rights to acquire a crypto asset upon launch in …
Technology / Sept. 22, 2020
GameFi investors should get ready for a big US crackdown
Are cryptocurrency games innocent fun? Or are they Ponzi schemes facing an imminent crackdown by regulators in the United States? Tokens related to cryptocurrency games — known colloquially as “GameFi” — were worth a cumulative total of nearly $10 billion as of mid-August, give or take a few billion. (The number may vary depending on whether you want to include partially finished projects, how you count the number of tokens that projects technically have in circulation, and so on.) In that sense, whether the games are legal is a $10 billion question that few investors have considered. And that’s an …
Regulation / Aug. 24, 2022
Staking ban is another nail in crypto’s coffin — that’s a good thing
Reactions were predictable depending on where you stand on crypto in general. Crypto advocates railed against regulators who are slowly asphyxiating this burgeoning industry, while skeptics celebrated crypto’s impending demise. The advocates have it right. Antagonistic regulators will force crypto into friendlier jurisdictions, which will reap the economic benefits. The skeptics have it right, too. This event, and much of those from last year, is killing crypto. Their apparent glee is misplaced, though. This is a good thing. Emboldened by the slew of blow-ups of crypto businesses in 2022, the SEC and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission have begun to …
Regulation / Feb. 10, 2023