SEC Nails Enigma ICO: Orders Refund, Registration and Fine

Published at: Feb. 19, 2020

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, recently announced its conquest over yet another unregistered ICO from 2017.

The SEC went after Enigma for its 2017 ICO, labeling the capital raise as an unregistered securities offering, the governing body said in a statement on Feb. 19.

Enigma settled with the SEC, agreeing “to return funds to harmed investors via a claims process, register its tokens as securities, file periodic reports with the SEC, and pay a $500,000 penalty,” the statement detailed.  

“This settlement, which is the culmination of an extended series of discussions with the SEC, clears the way for our development team to return its full attention and energy to our original and continued vision,” Enigma CEO Guy Zyskind told Cointelegraph. Enigma plans to continue operations, Zyskind said, adding that the company recently started up its mainnet.

Responding to Cointelegraph’s request for clarity on investor refunds, an SEC representative referred to page five of its order on the proceedings, according to which ENG purchasers will have the right to request a refund with interest. However, those content with their investment will be able to hold onto their ENG tokens as Enigma simply ups its public reporting requirements.

Enigma saw major funding in 2017

Enigma raised $45 million selling its ENG token, finishing its ICO sale in September 2017. Approximately one year after its ICO, the decentralized internet privacy solution even partnered with mainstream powerhouse Intel for tech privacy exploration and advancement.

According to its recent statement, the SEC classified ENG tokens as securities and pointed out the commission received no filing from Enigma for its tokens during the ICO.

The SEC ordered investor compensation

“All investors are entitled to receive certain information from issuers in connection with a securities offering, whether it involves more traditional assets or novel ones,” SEC Boston branch Associate Director for Enforcement John Dugan said in the statement. He added:

“The remedies in today’s order provide ICO investors with an opportunity to obtain compensation and provide investors with the information to which they are entitled as they make investment decisions.”

ENG, however, has not seen any notable price decline as of press time, according to CoinMarketCap data.

Since 2017, Cointelegraph has reported numerous SEC coin offering crackdowns, including an ongoing case with Telegram and its related GRAM asset. 

UPDATE Feb. 19, 19:21 UTC: This article has been updated with information Cointelegraph received from the SEC after initial publication.

UPDATE Feb. 20, 19:16 UTC: This article has been updated with information Cointelegraph received from Enigma after initial publication.

Tags
Sec
Ico
Related Posts
ICO issuer charged with fraud by SEC for selling unregistered security
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, has charged a cryptocurrency issuer for “making materially false and misleading statements” in connection with an unregistered security offering conducted between August 2017 and January 2018, offering further evidence that regulators were still targeting initial coin offerings from the last major market mania. Loci Inc., the platform behind LOCIcoin, and CEO John Wise were formally charged on Tuesday. The SEC claims that Loci and Wise misled investors about the company’s revenues, employee numbers and user base during the $7.6 million crowdsale. The regulator also alleges that Wise misused $38,163 in investor …
Regulation / June 22, 2021
SEC Orders ICO Startup to Return $25.5M to Investors
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has ordered cryptocurrency firm BitClave to return $25.5 million to investors. In a May 28 announcement, the SEC announced charges against the California-based cryptocurrency startup. The regulator found BitClave to be responsible for selling unregistered securities in its initial coin offering. Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Cyber Unit Kristina Littman commented: “Issuers of securities, traditional or digital, must comply with the registration requirements of the federal securities laws. [...] The remedies ordered by the Commission will provide meaningful relief to investors in this unregistered offering.” The SEC said, “BitClave agreed to …
Regulation / May 29, 2020
SEC Commissioner Peirce Asks ‘Who Did We Protect?’ in Telegram Shutdown
In her July 21 speech for Blockchain Week Singapore, Securities and Exchange Commissioner Hester Peirce, known among the industry as ‘CryptoMom,’ spoke out on her opposition to the SEC’s recently concluded suit against Telegram. SEC action against Telegram served neither investors nor mission Peirce’s speech, entitled “Not Braking and Breaking,” emphasized the roles and responsibilities of regulators regarding innovation, particularly in the light of the case against Telegram that came to an end in June. Telegram had sold $1.7 billion in contracts for GRAM tokens, which would be the native token of the Telegram Open Network. As preface, the commissioner …
Regulation / July 21, 2020
US SEC Freezes Assets of Alleged Crypto Scam Backed by a Former State Senator
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has frozen the assets of Meta 1 Coin, an alleged crypto scam backed by a former state senator that promised investors returns of up to 224,923% without ever having any actual tokens. Per a March 20 announcement from the SEC, the regulator initially froze Meta 1’s assets on March 16 and is charging the firm’s operators with fraud. Currently, the SEC seems to be pursuing fines and disgorgement rather than jailtime for those involved. Claims of art and gold assets Meta 1 claimed its tokens were backed, but the cited backing shifted …
Regulation / March 20, 2020
ICO Rating Settles With SEC Over Alleged Anti-Touting Violations
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Russian analytical agency ICO Rating for $268,998 for violating anti-touting provisions, according to an announcement on Aug. 20. In the announcement, the SEC claimed that ICO Rating violated the anti-touting provisions of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 by failing to disclose payments it received from initial coin offering (ICO) issuers it rated and published on its platform. Melissa Hodgman, Associate Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division, said: “The securities laws require promoters, including both people and entities, to disclose compensation they receive for touting investments so that …
Blockchain / Aug. 20, 2019